# \[e-drug\] Barriers to generic ARVs in (South) Africa

**URL:** <https://talk.edrugplus.org/t/e-drug-barriers-to-generic-arvs-in-south-africa/19762>\
**Category:** e-drug\
**Created:** [June 4, 2004, 8:21am UTC](https://talk.edrugplus.org/t/e-drug-barriers-to-generic-arvs-in-south-africa/19762 "2004-06-04T08:21:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![graya11](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/43a26b/32.png) [@graya11](https://talk.edrugplus.org/u/graya11)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2004, 8:21am UTC](https://talk.edrugplus.org/t/e-drug-barriers-to-generic-arvs-in-south-africa/19762/1 "2004-06-04T08:21:40Z")

</div>

E-DRUG: Barriers to generic ARVs in (South) Africa  
------------------------------------------------  
[The excellent analysis below (crossposted with thanks to Andy from  
DRUGINFO) shows the difficulties that generic companies have in getting to  
the market.

After clearing a long and delayed registration process, Cipla still has to  
get a voluntary license (promised by Boehringer in December 2003 after a  
deal with AIDS activists) before they can sell to the South African  
government ARV programme.

Secondly, all need WHO prequalification if they want to sell their product  
after December 2004 to one of the ARV projects supported by the Global Fund,  
as the South African Drug Regulatory Authority is not considered "stringent"  
by Global Fund. From all developing countries, so far only Singapore and  
Malaysia have qualified as PIC/S countries. Interestingly, even the  
efavirenz originator products of MSD have not yet been prequalified by WHO!

Finally, generics cannot be sold to PEPFAR projects unless they get FDA  
approval...

The December 2004 prequalification demand by Global Fund is applicable to  
ALL countries; I predict this is going to be a very serious hurdle for ART  
projects globally! And they need that once-a-day 600mg efavirenz quickly!

Wilbert Bannenberg, E-drug moderator]

Hi all

The latest MCC list of new registrations for May 2004 (see  
[http://www.mccza.com/documents/12.01%20Notification%20of%20Registration%20Ma](http://www.mccza.com/documents/12.01%20Notification%20of%20Registration%20Ma)  
y04%20v1.doc)  
contains some urgently needed products:

\* Aspen's didanosine 25mg, 50mg, 100mg, 150mg tablets  
\* Cipla's nevirapine 200mg tablet  
\* MSDs efavirenz 600mg tablet

These three products provide great examples of the tangled mess facing  
procurement officials.

The Aspen product can be marketed if the company has a voluntary  
license from the patent-holder (BMS). However, even if it is available  
to the SA market, those buying with Global Fund monies will not be able  
to purchase the product after 31 December 2004, unless it is  
prequalifiied by the WHO. This is because the MCC is not considered a  
"stringent" regulator by the GFATM ("stringent" being defined as a  
member of the ICH or PIC/S). Those paying with US PEPFAR funds cannot  
buy this product, as it is not approved by the FDA - an expedited  
"registration" process has been set up, but quite how easy that will be  
remains to be seen. However, what clinicians really want is not the  
buffered tablets, but the enteric coated version - the BMS Videx EC is  
awaiting final registration (has been for months), and there are as yet  
no prequalified or registered generic EC versions available. Videx EC  
has not been WHO prequalified, but is FDA approved.

Cipla's nevirapine would be a very useful alternative supplier to the  
national programme, but cannot be sold until the company completes  
voluntary license negotiations with BI. Once that hurdle is cleared,  
GFATM funds can be used to buy it (even after December 2004 as the  
product is already WHO prequalified), but PEPFAR funds cannot - the same  
FDA approval process would be needed.

The MSD efavirenz can be launched immediately (stock is expected next  
week), can be bought with GFATM and PEPFAR funds, but is not yet WHO  
prequalified - in fact, MSD has not had any products prequalified. Aspen  
has a license to make a generic, but still has to negotiate the MCC  
hurdle (and probably most of the formulation process as well), as well  
as WHO preqialification and FDA approval.

regards

Andy

Andy Gray MSc(Pharm) FPS  
\* Senior Lecturer  
Dept of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology  
\* Study Pharmacist  
Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research  
in South Africa (CAPRISA)  
Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine  
University of KwaZulu-Natal  
PBag 7 Congella 4013  
South Africa  
Tel: +27-31-2604334/4298 Fax: +27-31-2604338  
email: graya1@ukzn.ac.za or andy@gray.za.net  
---  
To send a message to Druginfo, write to: druginfo@healthlink.org.za  
To subscribe, write to: lyris@healthlink.org.za leave the subject line free  
and in the body of the message type: subscribe followed by your name  
and surname Or join online at:  
[http://lists.healthlink.org.za/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?join=druginfo](http://lists.healthlink.org.za/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?join=druginfo)

To visit the list archives go to:  
[http://lists.healthlink.org.za/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?visit=druginfo](http://lists.healthlink.org.za/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?visit=druginfo)

Enquiries and e-mail address changes: listadmin@healthlink.org.za

--  
To send a message to E-Drug, write to: e-drug@healthnet.org  
To subscribe or unsubscribe, write to: majordomo@healthnet.org  
in the body of the message type: subscribe e-drug OR unsubscribe e-drug  
To contact a person, send a message to: e-drug-help@healthnet.org  
Information and archives: [http://www.essentialdrugs.org/edrug](http://www.essentialdrugs.org/edrug)
