# \[e-drug\] GSK announces withdrawal of Combivir patent applications

**URL:** <https://talk.edrugplus.org/t/e-drug-gsk-announces-withdrawal-of-combivir-patent-applications/26298>\
**Category:** e-drug\
**Created:** [September 18, 2006, 8:38am UTC](https://talk.edrugplus.org/t/e-drug-gsk-announces-withdrawal-of-combivir-patent-applications/26298 "2006-09-18T08:38:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ellen.t.hoen1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5fc32e/32.png) [@ellen.t.hoen1](https://talk.edrugplus.org/u/ellen.t.hoen1)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2006, 8:38am UTC](https://talk.edrugplus.org/t/e-drug-gsk-announces-withdrawal-of-combivir-patent-applications/26298/1 "2006-09-18T08:38:24Z")

</div>

E-DRUG: GSK announces withdrawal of Combivir patent applications  
---------------------------------------------------

Dear e-druggers,

Please find below the text of GlaxoSmithKline (From GSK Website, under  
News Archive, 10 August 2006 link: [http://www.gsk.com/media/archive.htm](http://www.gsk.com/media/archive.htm)) in  
which the company states that it decided to withdraw all of its patents and  
patent applications for Combivir. It further states that this decision was  
made a while ago, and that the company had instructed its agents in June to  
withdraw the patent applications in India and Thailand, specifically.

With this move, GSK seems to have responded positively to the demands of  
the Thai and Indian groups of people living with AIDS and their supporters.  
However the information MSF has received from both Thailand and India does  
not entirely match with what the company is stating.

The patent office in Thailand apparently did not receive notice of the  
patent application withdrawal until getting a letter on 8 August, not in  
June, as the company stated (as also reported in the 21 August TNA article  
below). This was in fact one day after a large protest by patient and  
treatment advocacy groups took place outside the GSK offices in Bangkok and  
in Bangalore, India, urging the company to withdraw the Combid/Combivir  
patent applications. The Thai Commerce Ministry just yesterday in fact  
sent a letter to the Thai Network of People Living With AIDS (TNP+) about  
the patent withdrawal, attaching communication it received from GSK on 8  
August, not June.

In India, GSK has not officially communicated about the patent application  
withdrawal, and when the Manipur Network of People Living with HIV/AIDS /  
Lawyers Collective HIV/AIDS Unit contacted the patent office, it found that  
no official withdrawal has taken place. The Indian Network for People  
Living with AIDS (INP+), has now requested an official confirmation from  
GSK that it is withdrawing the application in India, and a copy of those  
instructions that it has sent to the patent office.

It seems clear that the protests had a significant effect. It is important  
that parties are allowed to raise concerns about patents and their effects  
on public health before a patent is granted. The pre-grant opposition  
process in particular is a crucial safeguard that needs to be protected.

MSF is concerned by the current move by Novartis in India to try challenge  
a key safeguard of the Indian Patents Act, which prevents trivial patents.  
In a hearing set for 26 September, Novartis will try to overturn a January  
2006 ruling that set a precedent by denying the company's patent request  
for the cancer drug Gleevec. The drug was not patentable under Indian law  
because it was merely a new form of a known substance. These are also the  
grounds on which the pre-grant oppositions to both GSK's patent application  
for Combivir and Gilead's application for TDF were filed by Indian PLWHA  
groups earlier this year. MSF supports this process.

Also find attached below an article from this week's Fortune Magazine on  
the attempts to patent ARVs in India. Note that the article makes no  
reference to the GSK patent applications having been withdrawn. [this has been deleted because it is identical to WBs posting this morning (patently unfair) Moderator]

Ellen 't Hoen  
MSF Access to Essential Medicines Campaign  
Ellen.T.HOEN@paris.msf.org  
--------------------------------------

From GSK Website, under News Archive, 10 August 2006 link:  
[http://www.gsk.com/media/archive.htm](http://www.gsk.com/media/archive.htm)  
GSK patents and patent applications for Combivir  
GSK offices in Thailand and India have recently been subject to  
demonstrations against GSK's patents applications for COMBID/COMBIVIR in  
those countries.

Prior to these demonstrations GSK had decided to withdraw its patents and  
patent applications directed to a specific formulation of Combivir. In June  
2006 GSK instructed its agents in Thailand and India to withdraw the patent  
applications.

The patent and patent applications relating to this specific formulation of  
Combivir have been withdrawn in all countries where it has been filed.  
Other patents and patent applications relevant to Combivir and other GSK  
antiretrovirals are not affected.

It is worth noting that these applications were made more than 8 years ago.  
A combination of in country delays and the impact of TRIPs have meant that  
these applications have only recently been subject to active processing.

GSK supports the World Trade Organisation's Trade-Related Aspects of  
Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) agreement, including the public health  
safeguards it contains. However, GSK believes that focus on patents in  
addressing the challenge of HIV/AIDS is misguided and counterproductive.  
New medicines and vaccines to address the challenge of HIV/AIDS are  
desperately needed and the patent system fundamentally stimulates the  
necessary research and development. The root cause of many countries’  
inability to address HIV/AIDS does not lie with the patent system but with  
the consequences of poverty, and lack of political will, leading to a lack  
of healthcare infrastructure and resources.

GSK recognises the challenge that HIV/AIDS has put on health systems and  
seeks to work in partnership with governments and NGOs to address this  
challenge. Dialogue with us on this issue prior to the recent  
demonstrations in Thailand and India would have made them unnecessary.

GSK's commitment and contribution to the fight against HIV/AIDS embraces  
four key areas - investment in research and development (R&D), preferential  
pricing of our antiretrovirals (ARVs), community investment activities, and  
partnerships that foster effective approaches against the disease and the  
challenges it presents. Details of our approach and progress can be found  
at: [http://www.gsk.com/responsibility/cr\_issues/dev\_world\_challenges.htm](http://www.gsk.com/responsibility/cr_issues/dev_world_challenges.htm)  
-----------------------------------------------------

Glaxo withdraws AIDS drug patent application in Thailand  
TNA 21 Aug 2006

BANGKOK, Aug 20 (TNA) - A phamarceutical giant decided to withdraw its  
earlier application to seek a Thai patent for its anti-retroviral drug  
Combid in a decision which will allow Thailand to produce a cheaper generic  
version to treat AIDS patients, a senior government official said Sunday.

Commerce Ministry deputy permanent secretary Yanyong Phuangrach disclosed  
that the Glaxo Group Limited Company informed the Intellectual Property  
Department about its decision in its letter dated August 8.

The company provided no reason for its decision, but the move came after a  
recent protest by hundreds of activists and HIV-infected patients at  
Glaxo's Bangkok office.

They argued that the drug was not a newly researched product but simply a  
combination of existing drugs.

The protestors also feared that the patent, if approved, would give the  
UK-based company a monopoly on the sales of Combid in Thailand.

The withdrawal of Glaxo's patent application means that the Government  
Pharmaceutical Organisation (GPO) will be able to continue production of  
its generic version, known as Zilarvir, which is much cheaper.

Mr. Yanyong hailed Glaxo's decision as a good example of corporate  
citizenship for other drug giants as the company has relinquished its  
potentially huge financial gain in exchange for social contributions  
benefiting Thailand. (TNA)-E001
