# \[e-drug\] MSF urges South Africa to stand strong in defiance of aggressive pharma

**URL:** <https://talk.edrugplus.org/t/e-drug-msf-urges-south-africa-to-stand-strong-in-defiance-of-aggressive-pharma/39983>\
**Category:** e-drug\
**Created:** [January 20, 2014, 4:46pm UTC](https://talk.edrugplus.org/t/e-drug-msf-urges-south-africa-to-stand-strong-in-defiance-of-aggressive-pharma/39983 "2014-01-20T16:46:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joanna\_KEENAN](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/96bed5/32.png) [@Joanna\_KEENAN](https://talk.edrugplus.org/u/Joanna_KEENAN)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2014, 4:46pm UTC](https://talk.edrugplus.org/t/e-drug-msf-urges-south-africa-to-stand-strong-in-defiance-of-aggressive-pharma/39983/1 "2014-01-20T16:46:44Z")

</div>

E-DRUG: MSF urges South Africa to stand strong in defiance of aggressive pharma  
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MSF urges South Africa to stand strong, to move ahead on patent law reforms,  
in defiance of aggressive pharma opposition to delay change and keep drug  
prices high

[http://www.msfaccess.org/content/msf-urges-south-africa-stand-strong-defiance-aggressive-pharma-moves-delay-change](http://www.msfaccess.org/content/msf-urges-south-africa-stand-strong-defiance-aggressive-pharma-moves-delay-change)

Johannesburg/Geneva, 20 January 2014 - Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) is  
encouraged that the South African government is standing strong against a  
broad multinational pharmaceutical industry effort to undermine and delay  
the country's effort to reform its patent laws and improve access to  
affordable medicines.

Documents leaked on 17 January (see more here) reveal plans for a covert,  
large-scale public relations campaign with a US$600,000 (R6 million)  
budget, financed largely by the US-based pharmaceutical lobby. The goal of  
the proposed strategy is to disrupt the country's long-awaited plans to  
bring into force public health safeguards absent in its patent system.  
These changes would, among other initiatives, ensure that companies cannot  
unfairly extend monopolies by simply changing a formulation or combining  
two medicines into a single tablet, and registering a new patent for this  
obvious change. This practice of patent - evergreening- unfairly blocks  
generic competition and keeps drug prices high, limiting patients' ability  
to access the life-saving medicines they need.

Countries such as Brazil and India have struck the right balance between  
promoting public health and access to medicines, while also protecting  
companiesâ intellectual property rights by granting patents for innovative  
developments. South Africa's new IP policy would modernise South Africa's  
laws in line with other middle income countries and international norms,  
and set a positive example for other countries in Africa who are also  
involved in patent law reform processes, but also want to ensure patients  
have the medicines they need.

'Thanks to leaked documents, we know that South Africa represents 'ground  
zero' for the looming legal battles on intellectual property between  
pharmaceutical companies and middle-income countries seeking access to  
affordable medicines for their people,' said Dr. Manica Balasegaram,  
executive director of MSF's Access Campaign. 'Big pharma doesn't want South  
Africa to reform its patent system and laws because they know other  
countries will follow suit.'

Because South Africa blindly hands out patents without examining their  
quality -granting more patents on medicines than even the U.S. and  
Europe - the country often cannot access generics available in other  
countries. Multiple patents on medicines in South Africa lead to some of  
the longest delays in the developing world for the introduction of generic  
competition. In some cases, such as for cancer medicine imatinib, South  
Africa pays up to 35 times more for originator products than other  
countries pay where robust generic competition is available.

The pharmaceutical companies' tactics to delay reform are a bid to  
evergreen as many drugs as possible before changes to the law go into  
effect. This will allow them to continue capitalizing on the market  
monopolies and increased profits evergreening of patents offers.

'The effort by big pharma to undermine national patent law reform comes as  
little surprise, since these are the same companies that tried to deny  
South Africans affordable antiretroviral medicines over a decade ago in the  
face of an exploding HIV epidemic' said Andrew Mews, Head of Mission for  
MSF operations in South Africa. 'History is repeating itself, with  
medicines to treat drug-resistant tuberculosis, cancer, and other diseases  
patented and priced out of reach for people and the health department'.

'We have seen outstanding results since pressuring companies into allowing  
generic ARVs into South Africa's lower prices improve access and have not  
harmed research and development into new HIV treatments. The government is  
now well-positioned to speed up necessary changes by passing the new  
policy, and improving implementation of existing patent rules as soon as  
possible.'

Background:

In September 2013, South Africa's Department of Trade and Industry (DTI)  
proposed reform of the intellectual property system and published the Draft  
National Policy on Intellectual Property (DNPIP) for public comment. (  
[http://www.thedti.gov.za/invitations/36816\_4-9\_TradeIndustry.pdf](http://www.thedti.gov.za/invitations/36816_4-9_TradeIndustry.pdf) )

Chapter 1 of the DNPIP recommends the use of a substantive search and  
examination system to determine whether applications, especially in the  
pharmaceutical sector, are valid or not.

Chapter 2 of the DNPIP notes that South African legislation should enact  
stricter criteria for granting a patent. Chapter 1 of the DNPIP notes that  
South Africa should provide for a pre- and post-grant opposition mechanism  
within national law to enable third parties to oppose weaker patents that  
fail to meet patentability standards.

Chapters 1 and 2 of the DNPIP acknowledges the need to modify existing  
legislation and regulations to address the difficulties in using both  
compulsory licensing and parallel importation measures, as neither  
provision has been successfully used to date on a pharmaceutical product.

Since November 2011, MSF, along with local partners, Treatment Action  
Campaign (TAC) and SECTION27 (S27), have run the 'Fix the Patent Laws'  
www.fixthepatentlaws.org) campaign in support of the DTI's intention to  
reform the intellectual property system.  
- A joint submission from  
MSF/TAC/S27 commenting on the DNPIP can be accessed here:  
[http://www.fixthepatentlaws.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/S27-TAC-MSF-Submission\_on\_IP\_Policy.pdf](http://www.fixthepatentlaws.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/S27-TAC-MSF-Submission_on_IP_Policy.pdf)

Joanna Keenan  
Press Officer  
Medecins Sans Frontieres - Access Campaign  
P: +41 22 849 87 45  
M: +41 79 203 13 02  
E: joanna.keenan[at]geneva.msf.org
