[afro-nets] Food for a faceless and cozy thought

Food for a faceless and cozy thought
------------------------------------

Human Rights Reader 134

HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

1. With their unchallenged dominance of fundamentalist market
ideology, transnational corporations have time and again vio-
lated human rights (HR), disregarded core labor standards, dis-
regarded on-the-job safety standards affecting the health of
blue collar workers, destroyed the environment and fostered cor-
ruption. (F. Bliss)

2. Throughout history, the face(s) of power had always been
visible. With Capitalism was born the faceless society, one that
has prevailed through its latest stage, namely Globalization. It
was through corporations, for the first time, that men exercised
power with impunity through the faceless front of national and
transnational corporations and the faceless men who run them.
(M. Scorza, La Danza Inmovil, Plaza y Janes Literaria, Barce-
lona, 1983)

3. Globalization further denies developing countries the very
basis by which rich countries themselves succeeded in develop-
ing, namely, state intervention to keep the vicissitudes of the
market under control. And we know that ultimately, markets react
to purchasing power, and not to needs in health, nutrition or
education or, for that matter, human rights.

4. On this issue, it is rather fascinating to note that the
World Development Report 2006 (WB, 2006) makes a remarkable
statement. It says that economic inequality results from unfair
power structures and political influence and an absence of cor-
rective measures of market failures. BUT it fails to take-on the
issue of proposing any accompanying policy recommendation(s)
that will address this state of affairs. It basically fails to
say that the 'further-faster-more' mentality of the powerful
driving the global market economy cannot go on indefinitely.
This prompts me to ask: Can we thus speak of the World Bank here
(again) being a pessimist-with-vested-interests? This shows to
me that the WB is most eloquent where it is silent by being de-
lightfully vague on what to do about their often good analytical
documents.

5. The WTO is not much better. It is one more instrument in the
toolbox of rich countries together with bilateral and regional
trade agreements which do as much to tilt the balance of trade
in favor of the rich.

6. To consolidate this tilt, rich nations' elites are actually
cozying-up with those of poor and middle income countries. That
is a win-win situation for all concerned: For all-that-'matter',
that is!

7. This comes as a corollary to the fact that poor and middle
income countries have typically strived to catch up economically
with rich nations rather than focusing on reaching the MDGs
(with its poverty reduction and public health goals) and on ful-
filling their obligations towards people's rights --in most
cases, in spite of persistent poverty problems in those coun-
tries.

8. As this Reader has said many times before, achieving the MDGs
will require rather massive transformations in the political
economy of those countries --a change that no external power is
in position to bring about.

Claudio Schuftan
Ho Chi Minh City
mailto:claudio@hcmc.netnam.vn

--
Mostly adapted from D+C, Vol.32, No. 10, October 2005, D+C,
Vol.32, No.11, November 2005, D+C, Vol.32, No.12, December 2005,
D+C, Vol.33, No.3, March 2006, Development in Practice, Vol.16,
No.1, February 2006, and 'Health Rights of Women Assessment In-
strument' (HeRWAI), HOM, Utrecht, 2006 (http://www.hom.nl).

Food for a faceless and cozy thought (3)
---------------------------------------

Claudio,

I totally agree with you and the article.

Globalization has killed localization.

I recollect my dad telling, how our village was practically
self-sufficient and everyone lived in harmony and total contentment,
with what they had. There was every product or service needed, locally
available within the village or within the neighbouring village,
obviating the need for incurring high cost in import of goods and
services, to the detriment of the local community.

But thanks to globalization, all this has changed. Now no longer, local
products and services are available. Almost every thing a local village
needs is imported from the capitals around the globe. So much so,
unemployment and unhappiness has risen to such high levels, there is
theft, robbery, killing, naxalite, terrorism, drug trade, arms trade,
etc., etc.

If we need to reverse all this, I think, we should ban currency
circulation and make local people, survive on local products and
services, thereby strengthening local economy first. The earlier system
of barter within the village was a very good system.

What do you and others feel?

Regards

--
Kris Dev.
mailto:krisdev@gmail.com

Food for a faceless and cozy thought (4)
---------------------------------------

Wonderful idea. Somewhat reminiscent of John Galt of Ayn Rand's Atlas
Shrugged.

But seriously, many of our remote villages are still self sufficient.
Can we see if these have a higher index for satisfaction and happiness -
A QOL scale for instance? The results could be an eye opener.

Interested? Any Sociologist?

--
Manjula Datta
mailto:manjulad@yahoo.com

Food for a faceless and cozy thought (5)
---------------------------------------

hm...

"Ignorance is bliss" I suppose.

Who will join me back to the village? Interested people can send me
their e-mail contacts (something they won't have after they moved to
their "nirvana" villages) and time when they want to move...or are these
"thoughts" only for the ones we want to keep poor?

I'm not an expert on globalization but I guess the discussion might be a
bit more complicated than what I read recently via afronets...

B

--
Somalia Malaria Technical Coordinator
mailto:somalia.mtc@merlin-eastafrica.org

Food for a faceless and cozy thought (6)
---------------------------------------

Well, being simple may be poor monetarily. But who says we need paper
money to be able to use e-mail? Can't there be a value on things that is
not linked to paper, and not commercial??
   
We need a radical rethink. This food is for a differnt kind of thought.
A thought that asks if there cannot be a value on the quality of life in
the absence of Globalisation? Can we not be self sufficient and yet stay
connected with other communities?
   
The thought needs to be radical and broad based. The present misery, is
TOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO high a price to pay for the material comforts that a
small proportion of us enjoy.

Manjula Datta
mailto:manjulad@yahoo.com

Food for a faceless and cozy thought (7)
---------------------------------------

I think what we need to ask ourselves, is having email and a phone line
important, or a measure of civilization, happiness etc? Certainly not
in my estimation. Yes we have to have money of some type for these
things. The question begs, are they important to measure happiness/
civilization. The leap into modernization is not all that simple
sometimes. I would think that health is the first priority, followed by
perhaps increased wages / living conditions. After these types of
things are achieved then the phone / email can be achieved with
education etc for those who want it.

I also think self sufficiency is whatever you want it to be. A bushmen
in Africa is quite self sufficient thank you. I believe that he would
prefer that we leave him alone, he don't care what everyone else is
doing.

Technology is not a measure of nor should it be included in the equation
of "What is self sufficiency?" One can be happy and prosperous to some
degree as long as he/she is healthy.

Craig Audiss
mailto:cybrcollectinc@yahoo.com