[e-drug] Expensive Rabies Vaccine In India

Dear All

Rabies is endemic in India, approximately more than 30,000 deaths are reporting per year and most of the cases reporting from rural areas.

Majority of the victims are treated by nerve/sample tissue vaccine up to now. Now the drug authorities in India have banned the Nerve Tissue Rabies Vaccine, which was available in government hospitals free of cost. WHO seems to be recommending tissue culture vaccines (Vero/Human diploid, chick embryo etc), which are available for high cost (RS 2000 or $45 per course)?

All modern tissue culture vaccines are available in India but they are not affordable to middle, low class income people who have more proximity to rabies bites.

Already 90% of the dog bite cases reporting from India now. Due to the above situation Governments Should take necessary action for availability of these modern tissue culture vaccines at affordable prices.

I also like to know what is the situation of Rabies in Europe and Africa. Please let us Share. What are the types of vaccine available at present in your countries? What is the procurement process? Etc.

Thanks in advance

Sincerely

Tirumala
Pharmacist
Chirala, Prakasam dist
Andhra Pradesh
India

[Moderator comment:
WHO is right - newer vaccines are much safer than the old nerve tissue vaccine, and people should get access to the safer versions. But no access to a safe vaccine is worse than access to an unsafe vaccine...

What is the policy of the Indian Government?

The WHO recommendations on rabies vaccine are found at http://www.who.int/vaccines/en/rabies.shtml#vaccines

An extract:

"Rabies vaccines

More than 100 years ago, Louis Pasteur and his colleagues developed the first crude rabies vaccine based on attenuated virus from desiccated nerve tissue. Unfortunately, the majority of post-exposure immunizations against rabies are still performed with vaccines of crude nerve tissue origin. Although continuously improved over the years, inactivated vaccines produced in sheep or goat brains (Semple) or suckling mouse brain (Fuenzalida) may be associated with serious adverse events. Possible post-vaccinal neurological reactions may include meningoencephalitis, meningoencephalomyelitis, mononeuritis multiplex, dorsolumbar transverse myelitis and ascending paralysis of the Landry type, usually occurring between one and two weeks after the first injection. With the Semple-type vaccines, the incidence of neurological reactions varies between 1 in 200 and 1 in 1600 recipients, with a lethality of up to 14%. Vaccines of the Fuenzalida type are associated with neurological complications in about 1 in 8000 to 1 in 27 000 courses. Furthermore, in terms of protective potency these vaccines are inferior to modern cell-derived vaccines. A complete post-exposure treatment using nerve tissue vaccines involves a prolonged and painful immunization course of up to 23 injections. Obviously, these vaccines are not recommended for pre-exposure immunization.

The human diploid cell rabies vaccine was introduced in 1967 and is regarded as the gold standard for rabies vaccines. However, the more recently developed and less expensive purified chick embryo cell vaccine and purified Vero cell rabies vaccine have comparable characteristics. They are all lyophilized and must be reconstituted. The potency of all cell-derived vaccines is assessed using a National Institutes of Health test and the WHO requirement is a potency of at least 2.5 IU per intramuscular dose.

Human diploid cell rabies vaccines are based on the Pitman-Moore L503 strain or, in one case, the Flury strain of rabies virus. Human diploid cell rabies vaccines have been given to more than 1.5 million people worldwide. Its protective efficacy in situations of heavy exposure has been shown in the Islamic Republic of Iran where none of 45 persons who received post-exposure treatment with this vaccine developed rabies following severe bites by rabid dogs or wolves.

The purified Vero cell rabies vaccine contains the Wistar strain of the virus, but with the Vero cell line as substrate. Clinical studies with the purified Vero cell vaccine show neutralizing antibody responses both after primary and secondary immunizations that are fully comparable to those seen after vaccination with the human diploid cell vaccines. In Thailand, post-exposure treatment using purified Vero cell vaccine and rabies immune globulin has been shown to be protective.

Purified chick embryo cell rabies vaccine is prepared from inactivated rabies virus of the Flury LEP-25 strain. No clinically important differences were observed when this vaccine was evaluated together with human diploid cell vaccines in studies on post-exposure protection of animals and humans and in pre-exposure immunogenicity studies. More than 30 million doses of the purified chick embryo cell vaccine have been administered worldwide.

Purified duck embryo rabies vaccine showed similar qualities to the other cell-derived rabies vaccines, but is no longer manufactured.

Despite applying potent, modern, cell-derived vaccines, about one "failure" in 1 million post-exposure treatments does occur. Careful analyses show that such failures are almost always associated with severe lesions on or near the head and/or inappropriate administration of the treatment.

There are no contraindications to any of these vaccines being used for post-exposure treatment. Should an allergic reaction occur, the modern vaccines of different cell substrate origin may replace each other. Pregnancy is not a contraindication to post-exposure treatment.

Although associated with mild and transient reactions, all the cell-derived rabies vaccines are considered safe. With human diploid cell vaccines, which are most thoroughly investigated, pain, erythema and swelling or itching at the injection site occur among 30%–74% of the recipients. Systemic reactions involving headache, nausea, abdominal pain, muscle aches or dizziness are reported among 5%–40% of vaccinees, and allergic oedema in 0.1%. One study reports fever among 3.6% of recipients of the human diploid cell vaccine. Systemic allergic reactions characterized by generalized urticaria accompanied in some cases by arthralgia, angiooedema, fever, nausea and vomiting have been reported. They are uncommon in persons receiving primary vaccination, but have occurred in up to 6% of persons receiving a booster dose, with onset after 2–21 days. These reactions have been shown to follow the development of IgE antibodies to b-propiolactone altered human serum albumin in the vaccine (b-propiolactone is used as an inactivating agent). According to the manufacturers of purified Vero cell rabies vaccine and purified chick embryo cell vaccine, allergic reactions are very rare after both primary and booster doses with these vaccines. Studies on the purified Vero cell rabies vaccine report local and general reactions in 10.6% of post-exposure treatment patients and complaints of mild to moderate reactions in 7%. Also, among intradermal or intramuscular recipients of this vaccine, low-grade fever was the only significant systemic event, occurring in 8% of all subjects and most frequently following intramuscular vaccination. In the same study, pruritus at the injection site was the only significant local reaction. Among 88 healthy adults receiving a total of 292 doses of purified chick embryo cell vaccine, 16.4% reported local side-effects, whereas 15.1% reported general symptoms.

Other cell-derived vaccines are available on a national scale only. For example, in the United States the Kissling rabies strain has been adapted to replication in lung fibroblasts of fetal rhesus monkeys. The resulting vaccine, which is given according to the same pre- and post-exposure schedules as the human diploid cell vaccine, is considered equally effective and may less often cause allergic reactions. In Japan, a vaccine type similar to the purified chick embryo cell vaccine, but based on the Flury HEP strain, has reached limited distribution. A primary hamster kidney-cell rabies vaccine is mainly used in China where it was licensed in 1989. Each year more than 5 million doses of this vaccine are administered in China, where it has now completely replaced the Semple-type rabies vaccine. A chromatographically purified version of the purified Vero cell rabies vaccine is about to be licensed in Europe."

...

"WHO position on rabies vaccines

All the above internationally available cell-derived rabies vaccines are of assured quality. If used properly, when necessary in combination with rabies immune globulin and immediate wound treatment, they are regarded as 100% effective in preventing death from rabies.

Despite development of less expensive vaccines against rabies and less vaccine-consuming administration schedules, many of the countries particularly affected by this disease can afford only the less efficacious and relatively dangerous nerve tissue vaccines. Due to their high rates of adverse effects, it is imperative that these vaccines be replaced by the more potent and safe cell-derived products. Veterinary rabies vaccines should not be used for humans."
]

E-DRUG: Expensive Rabies Vaccine In India (2)
---------------------------------------------

The rural communities of India are covered by Primary
Health Centres (PHCs). Theoretically PHSc are supposed
to be manned by qualified doctors and should stock all
essential medicines as defined in National Essential
Medicine List (based on WHO list).

Snake bites and dog bites are common problems in rural
India. Both Anti-Rabies Vaccine and Anti-Snake Venom
are supposed to be stocked and supplied free to
patients. In practice, many PHCs are without qualified
doctors and manned by paramedics. Also essential
medicines are perpetually in short supply.

Dr. Chandra M. Gulhati
Editor, MIMS INDIA
(Monthly Index of Medical Specialities)
New Delhi 110019. India.
e-mail: indianmims@yahoo.co.in