[e-drug] Kenya sees cure in Indian generics now

E-DRUG: Kenya sees cure in Indian generics now
--------------------------------------
{Thank you Philippa, This is reassuring news. Moderator]

Dear E-druggers

You may be interested to see this.

Philippa Saunders
Essential Drugs Program
UK
"Philippa Saunders" <edp@gn.apc.org>

Economic times June 3
NEW DELHI: The Kenyan health ministry has conceded that the country should
not have passed the anti-counterfeit law last year and said it would try and
make changes to ensure that imports of legitimate generics were not
affected.

This marks an important victory in Indias sustained efforts in Africa to
counter propaganda by multinational pharma companies against cheap generic
drugs.

The Kenyan health ministry has revealed at the recent WHO health assembly
that the anti-counterfeit legislation passed by the country was pushed by
its industry ministry and it had no clue about its ramifications, a commerce
department official told ET, adding that it said that it will try to make
changes to ensure that generics are not affected. The government now plans
to focus on countries such as Uganda, Nigeria, Zambia and Malawai that are
planning similar anti-counterfeit legislation. Generics are copies of drugs
that do not have patent protection in India, allowing any manufacturer to
produce them. The competition among manufacturers helps bring down prices
substantially. India is one of the worlds largest producers of generics with
yearly exports of an estimated Rs 30,000 crore, a sixth of which goes to
Africa.

Kenyas anti-counterfeit law could render genuine generics imported from
countries like India illegal if a company holding a patent to the
formulation in any country files a complaint.

This could happen despite the fact that the drug is off-patent in the
exporting countries. Kenya now seems to have realised that the legislation
could hamper access to cheap life saving drugs for its population. The
international intellectual property agreement (Trips) under the WTO allows
exports of generics to countries with insufficient production capacities on
public health grounds even if patents are held by companies in other parts
of the world.

The commerce department had earlier written to the Kenyan government
pointing out the downsides of the anti-counterfeit legislation and had also
held several meetings at the official level on the issue. Indian officials
have also met government representatives from other countries that are
planning similar legislation including Uganda, Nigeria and Tanzania to
sensitise them about the importance of generics for the poor.

We have to intensify our efforts in such countries, the official said.

One of the reasons behind anti-counterfeit legislation being considered in a
number of African countries is an attempt by global pharma companies to
create confusion between counterfeits (genuine drugs that are made in
violation of patents) and fake or spurious drugs that are harmful, the
official said.

Generics eat into the profits of large pharma companies holding patents to
those medicines in the Western countries as they cant make inroads into poor
countries that prefer to buy the cheap yet effective copies of the original
drugs.

E-DRUG: Kenya sees cure in Indian generics now (2)
-----------------------------------------
[A relevant point Sefali - but the wording was in the report of the WHA submission]

I will prefer to use the word "affordable" instead of "cheap" because the
word cheap has inferior meaning yet those medication are not that inferior.
Many do meet bioequivalence tests.

Sefali

MR Sefali
General Manager of NDSO
Lesotho
"Sefali" <gm@ndso.org.ls>
[Details added by moderator - we need affiliation and country with each message]

E-DRUG: Kenya sees cure in Indian generics now (3)
-----------------------------------------

Hi,
Atleast sanity prevails somewhere, where it is most needed to benefit the populations. Well done Kenya to show the way to others. Salutations to your policy makers for showing the needed understanding.

The designs of the powerful lobby of global,branded pharma manufacturers has indeed done a good job at its advocacy to throttle generics by comparing them with counterfeits.

Some governments and their unions have meekly accepted to accept the anti marginalised recommendations.

And now these masters of disinformation seem to be succeeding at removing WHO from monitoring of counterfeit medicines! I have not read about such tirade against WHO before. Will some one give scientific info on what wrongs WHO has committed in counterfeit policy, advocacy, training, monitoring?

Today WHO is being shown the door on counterfeits because its policies in this subject are not acceptable to the powerful. If such is the case, this success will be followed in future where ever the interest of industry is affected. Is not this precedence going to be lethal for the health of the world?

I am concerned.
Dr Vijay Thawani,

Dr Vijay Thawani
Group Owner, NetRUM
Nagpur
India
"Vijay Thawani" <vijaythawani@rediffmail.com>