[e-drug] behind-the-counter or "pharmacist only" prescription drugs

E-DRUG: behind-the-counter or "pharmacist only" prescription drugs
------------------------------------------------------------------
[The FDA is planning to introduce a 3rd category of prescription. Beyong the well-known "Over the Counter (OTC) and "Prescripton Only" there is now a plan to allow a pharmacist alloe "Behind the counter (BTC)" prescriptions.

Obviously, many developing countries also have a famous, although illegal 4th category, "Under the Counter (UTC)" prescriptions.

A number of countries have some form of these "Behind the Counter" prescriptions, including: Australia, Canada, France, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Denmark, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland.

WB]

Dear E-druggers,

In preparation for an FDA meeting on this topic next month, I would like to be sent any information concerning the evaluation of these programs in any of the dozen or so countries in which this form of presription drug dispensing is authorized.

Thanks very much

Sidney M.Wolfe M.D.
Director, Public Citizen's Health Research Group
1600 20th St. NW, Washington, DC. 20009
202 588-7735 fax 588-7796
e-mail swolfe@citizen.org
Web sites: www.citizen.org/hrg
www.worstpills.org

---
[Copied as fair use]
FDA explores behind-the-counter drug sales
Fri Oct 5, 2007 8:51am EDT
By Kim Dixon

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Food and Drug Administration said on Wednesday it may create a new category of drugs that would be available without prescription at drugstores, but only after consultation with a pharmacist.

The FDA will hold a public meeting on November 14 to hear feedback about the "behind the counter" concept, which could make some drugs now available by prescription more widely accessible to patients.

But the effort will meet resistance from heavyweights who market over-the-counter drugs. The Consumer Healthcare Products Association, which represents a wide range of companies from Kimberly-Clark Corp to Johnson & Johnson, opposes a three-tier system.

"We believe the current two-class system is the best system for consumers," said Elizabeth Funderburk, a spokeswoman for the group.

Only a few behind-the-counter drugs, such as Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc's Plan B birth control drug, are now sold in the United States. They are more common in Britain, several European nations, Australia, Canada and New Zealand.

Pharmacist groups in general support the effort to expand their role in the health care delivery system.

"Other countries have this approach and it's worked fairly well," said Charlie Sewell, an official with the National Community Pharmacists Association, which represents 23,000 independent, non-chain pharmacist owners, managers and workers.

The National Association of Chain Drug Stores, which represents big chains like CVS Caremark Corp and Walgreen Co, said the proposal could "offer yet another way for pharmacists to serve their patients."

The FDA said in other countries, criteria generally used for behind-the-counter status are: suitability for self-diagnosis, and a low potential for serious side effects and overdose.

The new access might help patients without health insurance because the medications would otherwise be available only with a prescription, the agency said.

The FDA said it wants input from the drug industry, medical community and advocacy groups about whether some drugs should become available on a behind-the-counter basis, what impact it would have on patients' use, and what criteria a drug would have to meet to be classified as behind-the-counter.

The agency also wants suggestions on what role a pharmacist should play in counseling and monitoring patients' use of a behind-the-counter drug, and what measures would be necessary to ensure patient safety.

E-DRUG: behind-the-counter or "pharmacist only" prescription drugs (3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Sid:

As Wilbert outlined Canada has a behind the counter category where you need
to ask the pharmacist for the medication. There are a variety of drugs in
Canada that have this designation including Plan B (morning after pill) and
transdermal scopolamine.

There hasn't been any formal evaluation of this system in Canada but when Plan B went from prescription only to behind the counter there were many reports of pharmacists asking women very intrusive questions.

regards,

Joel
--
Joel Lexchin MD
121 Walmer Rd.
Toronto ON
Canada M5R 2X8
Tel: 416-964-7186
Fax: 416-736-5227
E mail: joel.lexchin@utoronto.ca

E-DRUG: behind-the-counter or "pharmacist only" prescription drugs (6)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

dear E-druggers,

To follow up on what Beverly Snell wrote, there has been an evaluation
of the scheduling of drugs in Australia, including the Pharmacist Only
and Pharmacy Only schedules.

It is called the "Galbally Review" and you can find more details at http://www.tga.gov.au/docs/html/rdpdfr.htm

An important recommendation from this report was a review of the need
for the Pharmacist Only (S3) and Pharmacy Only (S2) schedules to exist
(basically suggesting there may not be any need for 2 schedules and the
two could be combined). As noted in the link above in 1995, after
receiving a report into the cost-benefit analysis of the S3 and S2
schedules, they decided to allow the two schedules to continue for 5
years pending further information from a follow up review.

This follow up review is currently being supported by a tender from the Pharmacy Guild of Australia; see:
http://www.guild.org.au/research/content.asp?id=1517

regards

David
Dr David Newby BPharm PhD
Senior Lecturer in Pharmacy
School of Biomedical Sciences
RM611 Medical Sciences Building
The University of Newcastle
Callaghan NSW 2308
Tel: +61 2 49215154
Fax: +61 2 49217903
Mob: 0411126333