E-DRUG: escitalopram vs citalopram ads - new article (3)
-------------------------------------------------------
In response to Stevan Gressitt's thoughts:
It's obviously a good idea to take away the "inert constituent" of a chiral
drug when this causes side-effects or opposes the desired effect. Even when
this constituent is truly inert, I agree that it would in principle be
better to avoid the chiral ballast. The question is how much one should be
prepared to pay for this prinicipal benefit.
You can now get 98 20mg-tablets of generic citalopram for 188,50 SEK in
Sweden: the corresponding price for 98 10mg-tablets of escitalopram is
777,00 SEK. Both preparations contain 10 mgs of escitalopram and citalopram
also contains 10 mgs of R-citalopram. Should we pay 4,1 times more to avoid
having R-citalopram cruising around in the blood and being excreted into the
environment? Or, if our goal is to reduce the "R-citalopram pollution",
would we be better off spending our money on efforts to reduce unnecessary
prescriptions of citalopram?
Staffan Svensson
Dept of Clinical Pharmacology
Sahlgren's University Hospital
Sweden
staffan.svensson@pharm.gu.se
--
To send a message to E-Drug, write to: e-drug@healthnet.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe, write to: majordomo@healthnet.org
in the body of the message type: subscribe e-drug OR unsubscribe e-drug
To contact a person, send a message to: e-drug-help@healthnet.org
Information and archives: http://www.essentialdrugs.org/edrug