[e-med] Cadre Mondial pour les activités de recherche développement essentielles en santé

Veuillez trouver ci-dessous un article publié cette semaine en anglais dans
le Lancet par Pierre Chirac (Medecins Sans Frontières) et Els Torreele (
Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative). L'article, particuliérement
pertinent en vue de l' Assemblée Mondiale de la Santé et des discussions
sur un cadre mondial pour les activités de recherche développement
essentielles en santé, porte sur le nombre de medicaments destinés aux
maladies négligées.

Veronique TERRASSE
Veronique.TERRASSE@geneva.msf.org

      Cadre Mondial pour les activités de recherche développement
      essentielles en santé

      Global framework on essential health R&D

      Pierre Chirac, Medecins Sans Frontieres, and Els Torreele, Drugs for
      Neglected Diseases Initiative

      One of the critical issues to be discussed at the next World Health
      Assembly (Geneva, May 22-26) will be a resolution about a global
      framework on essential health research and development. Over past
      years, the crisis in research and development in the worldwide
      pharmaceutical industry, and in particular the absence of research
      and development for new medicines targeting diseases that mainly
      affect people in developing countries (neglected diseases), has
      become a global concern.

      This worrying situation is clearly shown by the number of drugs
      targeting neglected tropical diseases. From 1975 to 1999, only 13
      drugs from 1393 new chemical entities (NCE) marketed were indicated
      for a neglected disease. The 13 drugs included four for malaria and
      nine for the most neglected diseases. Three more drugs could be added
      if tuberculosis is included in the analysis.

      We have updated these figures to 2004. From 2000 to 2004, an
      additional 163 NCEs have been marketed in the world, adding up to a
      total of 1556 NCEs for the 30 years from 1975 to 2004. During these 5
      years, four NCEs targeting neglected diseases have been
      commercialised. Artemotil is a derivative from artemisinine
      discovered in the Chinese traditional medicine Artemisia annua.
      Artemotil is available as injection for severe malaria. Artesunate is
      another derivative from artemisinine. Artesunate should be used only
      in combination (artemisinin-based combination therapy) to treat
      malaria. Different co-blisters containing artesunate with a partner
      drug (existing antimalarials such as sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine,
      amodiaquine, mefloquine) are available on the market. Furthermore,
      several co-formulations containing artesunate and the partner drug in
      the same tablet are being developed. Lumefantrine is marketed as a
      co-formulation with artemether, also a derivative from artemisinine.
      Miltefosine is the first oral dug against leishmaniasis. The
      combination of chlorproguanil with dapsone (Lapdap) has also been
      launched during the past years. It is not a NCE, but there has been
      research on this drug.

      In total, over the past 30 years, the number of drugs targeting
      neglected diseases is ten if we consider the most neglected diseases,
      18 if we add malaria, and 21 if we add tuberculosis. These totals
      still represent only around 1% of all NCEs (1556) launched during
      this period - a situation that is essentially unchanged from 5 years
      ago.

      The emergence of product-development partnerships for neglected
      diseases has been encouraging: with sufficient funding the current
      pipelines for neglected diseases could potentially deliver eight to
      nine drugs within the next 5 years. Although such a step forward
      would be good, it is not enough to change the overall situation.
      Product-development partnerships in drug research and development for
      neglected diseases still mainly depend on philanthropic funding,
      which reached US$212 million by April, 2005, or 78.5% of the total
      funding of these initiatives, much of it from the Bill & Melinda
      Gates Foundation. Public funding was calculated at a low 16%,
      although the British Government in March, 2006, announced substantial
      additional funding worth £17 million (or about $30 million). With
      promising drug compounds moving into more expensive clinical trials,
      there remains a funding gap of several hundred million dollars for
      existing initiatives alone.

      There is definitely a proactive role for WHO to play here, because
      only a long-term commitment by governments to fund and otherwise
      support research and development in neglected diseases in the public
      interest would substantially change the situation of neglected
      diseases and neglected patients.

      The report of the WHO's Commission on Intellectual Property Rights,
      Innovation, and Public Health, released April 3, 2005, is urging WHO
      to "develop a Global Plan of Action to secure enhanced and
      sustainable funding for developing and making accessible products to
      address diseases that disproportionately affect developing
      countries". The World Health Assembly's discussion in May on a global
      framework on research and development in essential health will be a
      timely opportunity for governments to take action to ensure
      needs-driven research and development addressing rich and poor
      patients' needs. Member states should warmly welcome the resolution
      on research and development and start building a new framework on
      research and development for essential health.