[e-drug] Influence prescribing by paying bonus

E-drug: Influence prescribing by paying bonus
-------------------------------------------

Dear E-druggers,

In the Netherlands there seem to be continuing attempts to influence prescribing by offering bonuses for improved practices. A couple of years ago I reported on a trial in which family physicians were paid by a health insurer to prescribe less, and in which some of the savings of their improved prescribing were paid out to them ("Prescribe better - Make more money"). I did not hear much anymore of that trial, neither in E-drug, nor in The Netherlands.

Now a Dutch health insurer is trying again to influence prescribing by
paying out bonuses for improved behaviour (see BMJ article below, copied as fair use). This sort of thing interests me a lot, and I wonder what E-druggers think of it, and whether they are aware of similar trials elsewhere.

Hilbrand Haak
Consultants for Health and Development
--------------------------------------
Sleedoorntuin 7
2317 MV Leiden
The Netherlands
tel: +31-71-523.2052
fax: +31-71-523.3592
e-mail: haakh@chd-consultants.nl
Visit CHD's website at www.chd-consultants.nl

-----------
BMJ 2006;332:254 (4 February 2006)

Dutch insurance company will pay doctors to prescribe cheap drugs
Tony Sheldon

A court in the Netherlands has rejected attempts by doctors and patients' groups to stop a health insurance company offering financial rewards to doctors for prescribing cheap generic versions of statins and proton pump inhibitors.

The court ruled that the scheme, from Menzis, one of the largest health
insurers, does not remove doctors' independence or obligation to make their own choice of which drugs to prescribe. Such choices are based on professional standards to which the doctors must adhere and "there is nothing to show that doctors would deviate from these simply because of the
bonus," it concluded.

The Dutch Medical Association retains "serious objections" to the scheme, "strongly advising" its members against the scheme, which, it argues, amounts to an "undesirable influence on GPs prescribing behaviour."

The Menzis initiative is seen as a test case because the medical
profession is concerned that powerful health insurers will seek to influence clinical judgments to reduce costs. Insurers have been accused of "sitting in the doctor's chair."

Menzis, based in Groningen, is the market leader in health insurance in
parts of the Netherlands. GPs need contracts with Menzis to work in these areas. As part of these contracts, GPs are being invited to join a "rational prescribing module" in which they are financially
rewarded for new patients who choose cheaper generic medicines for
lowering cholesterol and reducing gastric acidity, such as the statin simvastatin and the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole.

GPs will receive bonuses for hitting annual targets of up to 85% of new
patients choosing simvastatin and 95% of new patients choosing omeprazole. Menzis says average bonuses could amount to 2000 (£1370; $2420) a year, but they stress that this can only be spent on "improvements in GP care."

E-DRUG: Influence prescribing by paying bonus (2)
---------------------------------------------

   Dear Hilbrand,

   Well, how about managed care or insurance or regional formularies??
   All part of the same attempts to save money by influencing
   prescribing. This insurances now does the same as the industry has
   been doing for ages: they reward doctors for prescribing 'their'
   products.

   I actually find this attempt less harmfull: doctors still can and may
   prescribe what they want and the patient will get reimbursement unless
   it is on the national Dutch list of non-reimbursed meds. Additionally,
   it saves money in the health care system.

   It is an interesting discussion (but very much a discussion in the
   developed and rich world): what rights do patients have to best
   treatment or personal choices, when others (insurances or national
   insurance schemes) pay the costs for them. What rights do doctors have
   to practice as-they-like after they have graduated? What role should
   insurances have to protect their insured from malpractice by doctors
   who prescribe too expensive diagnoses or treatments as a result of
   commercial industry pressure?

   Foppe van Mil, community pharmacist

Pharmacy Practice Consultant, Zuidlaren, The Netherlands
  Visit our website at www.vanmilconsult.nl

Margrietlaan 1, NL 9471 CT Zuidlaren, The Netherlands
Tel: +31 50 4029095. Fax +31 50 4090732
Email: jwfvmil@planet.nl

E-DRUG: Quality - an access related issue
-----------------------------------------

Dear E-Druggers,

Quality is definitely a very important issue when we talk about access to essential drugs. (Availability and affordability although are the most debated ones). I am an e-drugger from Pakistan working on Access issues since last five years. The issue of quality of pharmaceuticals is of immense problem here in Pakistan where the basic standards for registration don't seem to be optimal.

I work in public clinical settings and want to run a study on the methods of quality check by regulatory authorities carried out for registration purposes. I intend to carry out a study on Intravenous antibiotics ( third generation cephalosporin) commonly used in the treatment of acute illness like meningitis and sepsis.

[All the drugs, which we use in public hospitals, are tested and passed by the laboratories but still the response is not good. The prognosis improves on changing the brands as well.]

Will any participant of e-drug forum help me formulate the study o provide me suitable references on the subject. I plan to check the efficacy and quality of theses injectables from three aspects

1. Potency checked by routine BP/USP method
2. Antimicrobial activity against its clinically defined spectra
3. Third and the most difficult area clinical efficacy

The topic may not seem relevant to the participants from countries where regulatory authorities are strong. My key point is this that these drugs are bought by patients or distributed to nursing stations for use in life saving situations. A drug, which does not produce effect, should not be allowed for sale in market. It poses threat to the life of the patients in which it is used. More over a doubtful efficacy may have impact on marking the real drug falsely as resistant and motivating clinicians to prescribe more expensive antimicrobials.

Best to regards to all,

Huma Nouman
Clinical Pharmacist
The Children's Hospital & The Institute of Child Health Lahore
Pakistan
huma_rasheed@hotmail.com