E-DRUG: Migraine management

E-drug: migraine management
---------------------------

Note from the moderator:
This is the first summarized abstract from the E-drug literature group.
Joel Lexchin kindly offered to review the Canadian Medical Journal
for E-drug.

More reviewers are welcome!

Wilbert Bannenberg, E-drug moderator

----------------

Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of migraine in clinical practice

William E.M. Pryse-Phillips, MD; David W. Dodick, MD; John
G. Edmeads, MD; Marek J. Gawel, MD; Robert F. Nelson, MD;
R. Allan Purdy, MD; Gordon Robinson, MD; Denise Stirling,
MD; Irene Worthington, BScPhm

Can Med Assoc J 1997;156:1273-87

Abstract

        Objective: To provide physicians and allied health care
        professionals with guidelines for the diagnosis and management of
        migraine in clinical practice.

        Options: The full range and quality of diagnostic and therapeutic
        methods available for the management of migraine.

        Outcomes: Improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of
        migraine, which will lead to a reduction in suffering, increased
        productivity and decreased economic burden.

        Evidence and values: The creation of the guidelines followed a
        needs assessment by members of the Canadian Headache Society
        and included a statement of objectives; development of guidelines
        by multidisciplinary working groups using information from
        literature reviews and other resources; comparison of alternative
        clinical pathways and description of how published data were
        analysed;
        definition of the level of evidence for data in each case; evaluation
        and revision of the guidelines at a consensus conference held in
        Ottawa on Oct. 27-29, 1995; redrafting and insertion of tables
        showing key variables and data from various studies and tables of
        data with recommendations; and reassessment by all conference
        participants.

        Benefits, harms and costs: Accuracy in diagnosis is a major
        factor in improving therapeutic effectiveness. Improvement in the
        precise diagnosis of migraine, coupled with a rational plan for the
        treatment of acute attacks and for prophylactic therapy, is likely to
        lead to substantial benefits in both human and economic terms.

        Recommendations: The diagnosis of migraine can be improved
        by using modified criteria of the International Headache Society as
        well as a semistructured patient interview technique. Appropriate
        treatment of symptoms should take into account the severity of the
        migraine attack, since most patients will have attacks of differing
        severity and can learn to use medication appropriate for each
        attack. When headaches are frequent or particularly severe,
        prophylactic therapy should be considered. Both the avoidance of
        migraine trigger factors and the application of nonpharmacological
        therapies play important roles in overall migraine management and
        will be addressed at a later date.

        Validation: The guidelines are based on consensus of Canadian
        experts in neurology, emergency medicine, psychiatry,
        psychology, family medicine and pharmacology, and consumers.
        Previous guidelines did not exist. Field testing of the guidelines is
        in progress.

        Sponsors: Support for the consensus conference was provided
        by an unrestricted educational grant from Glaxo Wellcome Inc.
        Editorial coordination was provided by Medical Education
        Programs Canada Inc.

Joel Lexchin MD
121 Walmer Rd.
Toronto, Ontario
CANADA M5R 2X8
Phone: (416)-964-7186
Fax: (416)-923-9515

--
Send mail for the `E-Drug' conference to `e-drug@usa.healthnet.org'.
Mail administrative requests to `majordomo@usa.healthnet.org'.
For additional assistance, send mail to: `owner-e-drug@usa.healthnet.org'.